These sources include conflicting reports from Maesters and Septons, as well as a court jester named Mushroom. Throughout Fire & Blood, Gyldayn discusses his differing sources for his work, especially during the section dealing with the Dance of the Dragons. Fire & Blood is written as a history book by the fictional Archmaester Gyldayn, whereas House of the Dragon is a narrative TV show that adapts only a small portion of the centuries-long history covered in Fire & Blood. Starting out, the biggest difference between Fire & Blood and House of the Dragon is each work's individual structure. Don't worry, book loyalists: Change can be a good thing, and in House of the Dragon's case, a grand majority of the adaptation choices work to enhance the narrative instead of detract from it.įrom structural differences to missing characters and more, here are the biggest changes House of the Dragon has made so far.Ĭaraxes, my beloved.
However, just like with the TV adaptation of Game of Thrones, House of the Dragon makes several changes from the source material in order to make the transition from page to screen.
House of the Dragon focuses on the Dance and the events leading up to it, including the rivalry between Princess Rhaenyra Targaryen and Queen Alicent Hightower. Martin's massive fantasy tome Fire & Blood to the small screen.įire & Blood tells the history of House Targaryen as they ruled over Westeros, including events like Aegon's initial conquest and the civil war knowns as the Dance of the Dragons.
The ultimate game of thrones recap series#
The Game of Thrones prequel series House of the Dragon is finally here, bringing George R.R.
0 kommentar(er)
